The Book Pile: The Man Who Loved Books Too Much

by Christopher Gronlund on February 8, 2010

I’ve been meaning to write a review about Allison Hoover Bartlett’s The Man Who Loved Books Too Much for awhile, now.

The book was given to me as a Christmas gift; it was one of my favorite gifts received last December.

The Man Who Loved Books Too Much is the true story of John Gilkey, a thief of rare books, and Ken Sanders, a rare bookseller turned detective out to stop Gilkey and his obsession. The reporting is honest and thorough; the author presents the facts and leaves the reader to decide just how bad a man John Gilkey is.

For me, this is where the book gets very interesting. I would never steal a rare book, but I think there is a little bit of Gilkey in many book lovers. Put me near first edition Vonneguts, first editions of the books that made me want to write, or first editions of the books read to me as a child and and I’d feel their pull.

John Gilkey is your average guy who believes he was destined for greater things. You know that guy who says life didn’t deal him a fair hand? That’s John Gilkey.

Unable to attain those greater things, he begins stealing books. While Gilkey’s main reason for stealing books stems from a love of reading and obsessive character qualities, he has other reasons for becoming a thief. Gilkey hopes to amass a collection that will brand him as an erudite individual with social standing–because, obviously, to have such a wonderful collection, one must have things going for him!

On his trail is Ken Sanders, a quiet man who sells rare books. While my initial description of the book may have you thinking it’s a cat-and-mouse chase story like Catch Me if You Can, The Man Who Loved Books Too Much is never hurried, yet I couldn’t stop turning the pages.

“Some pay for their success with soaring blood pressure or dissolved marriages. He paid with jail time.”
- Allison Hoover Bartlett, from The Man Who Loved Books Too Much

What I loved most: The Man Who Loved Books Too Much is a book about what makes obsessive people tick. Allison Hoover Bartlett opens the back of John Gilkey’s pocket watch and shows us the mechanism that keeps him ticking along, seemingly unable to stop himself from stealing books. Even after serving repeated prison time, Gilkey keeps at it.

It’s that focus on obsessive psychology readers will find fascinating while reading this book. I find John Gilkey to be an extremely annoying and odious individual. I would never pretend that he is justified in what he does (Gilkey’s justifications for stealing all fall flat with me). But for as wrong as he is, I feel for him. I believe that Gilkey believes he’s protecting rare books from many of the wealthy collectors who buy them just because they can. He is a quirky, unlikeable person with a likeable trait: a love of books.

I would love to have a first edition of Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby. Few times while reading have I ever felt for a character as much as a scene in the book when a list of resolutions to improve Gatsby’s life is found written in the back of a Hopalong Cassidy book. Like Gatsby, Gilkey struggles with who he is and what he wishes he were. The difference: Gatsby did it, while Gilkey seems destined to repeated failure. Desperation, sadness, and the easy way out replaces drive in Gilkey’s world.

Near the end of The Man Who Loved Books Too Much, Allison Hoover Bartlett breaks away from the story of Gilkey and Sanders and talks about the future of books. She briefly ponders the fate of physical books when e-books become widely accepted. She mentions her teenage children, and touches on their relationship with reading:

“They will have no objection to reading e-books. At the same time, though, I think that may strengthen their attachment to the physical books they do keep.”
- Allison Hoover Bartlett

I know this is true for me.

Even when e-books become the norm, there will always be people who love physical books too much. In some way, perhaps more than ever.

If you feel a need to defend physical books in a world that’s going electronic, there’s a little bit of John Gilkey inside you.

The Man Who Loved Books Too Much examines this trait in many of us who love books, while doing an excellent job giving the reader an inside look at the world of rare books and literary obsession.

{ 3 comments }

Will Write for Food

by Christopher Gronlund on February 5, 2010

In the comments of a recent post, a member of the writing group I’m in said this about e-books becoming more common:

“I suspect it will be easier to get an audience via the e-book revolution, and harder to make a career”
- Mark Felps

I’ve seen things get harder when the self publishing boom of the 90s hit comic books and things got crowded. And while I see a lot of good things as e-books become more accepted, I agree with Mark that it will be harder than ever to make a career strictly writing in the future.

In the comments of that recent post, Mark goes on to talk about the “long tail.” For those not familiar with the long tail, it’s a retailing concept for selling things that don’t have a large audience.

With music, most stores stock popular musicians, but obscure musicians often don’t see rack space. That doesn’t mean there’s not demand for obscure bands–it just means there’s not as much demand for obscure bands as there is for very popular bands.

The “long tail” is comprised of all those obscure brands. The concept is, if you can be the person being the one-stop place for the obscure bands, you can make money by focusing on a niche that larger retailers usually ignore.

The problem with the long tail as a creative individual is, unless you are the person selling all the obscure bands, you’re a handful of sales out of thousands of obscure bands. In other words, while you and a thousand other obscure bands may see 25 sales each, the person organized enough to bring all the obscure bands together sells 25,000 units. (The organizer makes a living–the obscure artists in a flooded market still don’t.)

You may only sell a handful of e-books without a publisher backing you, while the group compiling and handling the sales of all the obscure writers out there offering e-books sells enough to make a living.

*          *          *

Here’s my dream writing job: I wake up and write for several hours. I have lunch with my wife, or meet friends for lunch. I write some more, and then run errands. After dinner, maybe I edit, maybe I write, I go for a walk, or maybe I relax. I produce books on deadline and my agent sells them and gives me money. Maybe I do book signings, here and there, but in general, I write, turn it over, and let others do what they do best so I can do what I do best (write).

I’d love a flying car and world peace, too.

Things have changed.

*          *          *

It’s easy enough to make a living as a decent-enough programmer, salesperson, or manager.

To make a living writing, you have to be your best, and even then, that best may not be enough to support yourself by strictly writing stories.

Sitting down to write, selling what you’ve written, and making a living with words happens to very few people who set out for the dream.

The odds are against you; the odds have always been against you.

Yet, somehow, there have always been writers who rose to the top.

I think Mark is right, it is harder than ever to make a living writing.

But each year, some writers still do it.

*          *          *

While there are writers who do make it each year, there are more who slip from the midlist each year and have to find other ways to pay the bills.

I think Mark is right: because of a coming flood of e-books, it will be harder for a writer to make a living in the future; in fact, we’re already seeing it.

If you write fiction, many agents hope you can also write non-fiction so they have more to sell. Agents want writers who aren’t afraid of getting up in front of people and speaking. Writers are expected to spend almost as much time selling themselves as they do writing.

It’s not all bad, though.

While it may be harder than it’s been to make a living just sitting in a room and writing fiction, there are more opportunities than ever for a writer willing to work hard writing fiction, non-fiction, speaking, and doing other things only limited by creativity and drive.

What do you think: do e-books and other changes in publishing make it harder or easier for a writer to earn a living?

{ 4 comments }

What’s Worse than Piracy?

February 4, 2010

“Obscurity is a far greater threat to authors and creative artists than piracy.”
- Tim O’Reilly
Tim O’Reilly’s quote (often attributed to Cory Doctorow), has always rung true with me. Not that I like the thought of people taking and trading an artist’s work for free, but if people are sharing your work illegally, it’s likely that [...]

Read the full article →

The Problem with E-books (Pt. 1: Because I Know There Will Be More)

February 2, 2010

While I’ve spent some time touting e-books, I am not one of those people shouting, “Death to print! E-books now!”
E-books have some serious drawbacks, and the biggie to me as a writer and a reader: an inability to share.
Oh, sure–the Barnes and Noble Nook allows limited sharing with other Nook owners. And if you own [...]

Read the full article →

Listening to TV Talk

February 1, 2010

Whether you watch television or avoid it, writers can learn a lot about storytelling by listening to people talk about the TV shows they watch.
Not a week has gone by at any job I’ve ever had where people didn’t talk about their favorite shows. The day job is a great place to learn what people [...]

Read the full article →

The Platform of Silence

January 29, 2010

J.D. Salinger is dead.
I’m not going to talk about what an influence he was on my writing because it was just last year that I finally got off my lazy goddamn ass and read that stinking book he wrote–you know, that one everybody talks about and stuff; the really famous one with the rambling narrator [...]

Read the full article →

A Delicate, Floating State

January 27, 2010

Things change.
I grew up with three major networks on television and PBS. UHF channels were like cable…that is, until cable came around.
I grew up reading books — I love books! Lately, though, most fiction and non-fiction I’ve purchased has been electronic, read on my iPhone with the Kindle app and Stanza.
Later today, Apple will announce [...]

Read the full article →

Looking Ahead

January 25, 2010

My first novel was well received by agents, but I heard this more than a  few times:
“I don’t know how I’d market this. Humor, or horror? It’s not at all scary.”
There is a reason it’s not scary: it’s not horror.
My first novel, Hell Comes with Wood Paneled Doors, is a humorous coming of age story [...]

Read the full article →

Ten Things Writers Can Learn from Conan O’Brien

January 23, 2010

“Nobody in life gets exactly what they thought they were going to get. But if you work really hard and you’re kind, amazing things will happen.”
- Conan O’Brien
Last night was Conan O’Brien’s final episode of The Tonight Show.
Before he was a late night TV host, Conan was a writer, working on Not Necessarily the News, [...]

Read the full article →

Queries that Worked: Personal Writing Magazine

January 22, 2010

The last query letter of the week is a pitch sent to Writer’s Digest.
I’d read Writer’s Digest on and off since I was in my late teens, and decided to send a query for a sort of travel piece:
*          *          *
[Note: My contact information is flushed right on my query]
Christopher Gronlund
ADDRESS
CITY, STATE & ZIP
PHONE
E-MAIL ADDRESS
DATE
NAME
POSITION
ADDRESS
CITY, [...]

Read the full article →